![]() ![]() Eliot and the writers of the Chicago School, to formulate his theories, often by highlighting key ideas in those authors works in order to refute them. Wimsatt also drew on the work of both ancient critics, such as Longinus and Aristotle, and some of his own contemporaries, such as T. He was a member of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. Wimsatt was considered crucial to New Criticism (particularly New Formalist Criticism 1372). His major works include The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (1954) Hateful Contraries (1965) and Literary Criticism: A Short History (1957, with Cleanth Brooks ). At the same time, it also suggests that the present-day ubiquity and predictability of this critical method makes its claims to intellectual novelty or political boldness ever harder to sustain.He wrote many works of literary theory and criticism such as The Prose Style of Samuel Johnson (1941) and Philosophic Words: A Study of Style and Meaning in the Rambler and Dictionary of Samuel Johnson (1948 Leitch et al. Rather, it seeks to take the hermeneutics of suspicion seriously and to understand why it has proved so attractive to contemporary scholars. The goal of the essay, then, is not to critique and be suspicious of suspicion. Deconstructionist critics like Shoshana Felman seek to expose the dangers of such a suspicious hermeneutics but remain thoroughly entangled in the very method they seek to repudiate. ![]() The literary critic, like the detective, interprets clues, establishes causal connections, and identifies a guilty party: namely, the literary work accused of whitewashing or concealing social oppression. ![]() ![]() These pleasures include the aesthetic and ethical satisfactions of fashioning detective-fiction-style plots. Suspicious reading, it proposes, is not only an intellectual exercise in demystification, but also a critical style and scholarly sensibility that offers specific pleasures. This essay examines the distinctive features of such a hermeneutics as they have shaped literary theory and criticism in recent decades. The hermeneutics of suspicion is a term coined by Paul Ricoeur to describe the practice of reading texts against the grain to expose their repressed or hidden meanings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |